OreCAT op-ed Discussion

The following discussion comments were posted by OreCAT on the Democrat Herald newspaper website in response to the October 23rd article, “Mailbag: A Cougar Story

Photo courtesy of the Mountain Lion Foundation


We have an epidemic of greed and ignorance, not cougars.  Asalways just before State Legislature, we hear about cougars.  They are not forgotten because to kill a cougar means money for the hounds men.  Up to $6000 per dog and $12,000 per hunt.  They want their dogs back and exploiting cougar in the news and keeping people ignorant about them, is an effort to pass a Bill to use hounds to kill cougar here in Oregon.  Because cougar are extinct in 36 States of the Union primarily from “sport” hunting, Oregon Cougar Action Team a not-for-profit 501c3 was started to help protect Oregon’s Cougar.  Their website is:  www.OreCat.org and they offer for free community presentations and volumes of free downloadable documents regarding non-lethal protection of livestock such as predator pen building programs and more. One document alone is over 20 pages of valuable information.   Tax payer dollars regarding poor livestock management are reduced when OreCat’s documents are used to protect livestock from cougar.  This cougar did not have to die a terrible death in a trap.  The goats did not have to fall victim to poor livestock management that made them vulnerable. Livestock should never be a turnkey operation.  Oregonians cannot afford to live in ignorance about their cougar and according to OSU, the Smithsonian, Dr. Jane Goodall and many more, we cannot afford to have our cougar so poorly cared for.  There is no sustainable plan for orphaned cubs, and they are treated as vermin and either left to die or are raised in captivity and eventually released near public and livestock.  Read Ron Baker’s book, “The American Hunting Myth”, and get the DVD influenced by Professor William Ripples research, “Lords Of Nature, Life In The Land Of Great Predators” www.LordsOfNature.org.  Join OreCat to help save Oregon’s cougar from greed and ignorance.

MLF Review – Weekly Electronic Newsletter (10/6)

The following edition was emailed to Mountain Lion Foundation newsletter subscribers on Wednesday, October 6th.  To receive the MLF Review in your inbox, click on the green box to sign up:

Because the following newsletter is posted as an image, the web links will not work.  To read more about any of the articles under the MLF Cougar Clippings heading, visit our Newsroom.  Any additional relevant links are posted below the newsletter.

o Home o Newsroom o Library o States o Forum o Donate o About

MLF Cougar Clippings (click here for the SD Airport, FL Panther, and ND Hunting articles)

On Air with Toni Ruth

Become a Member

MLF Review is a service of the Mountain Lion Foundation. All material is copyright of the Mountain Lion Foundation and may be used with attribution for non-commercial purposes.


Is South Dakota Killing Too Many Lions?

Is South Dakota killing too many lions?

A report from the Black Hills Mountain Lion Foundation after their September 18th educational seminar “Mountain Lions in the Black Hills: Facts and Fiction” presented by wildlife biologist Dr. John Laundre.

By increasing hunting quotas the South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks department may threaten the viability of the state’s mountain lion population, according to a wildlife biologist who has studied cougars for more than 20 years. Adjunct professor in the State University of New York at Oswego biology department, Dr. John Laundre was the keynote speaker at Mountain Lions in the Black Hills: Facts and Fiction, an educational seminar sponsored by the Black Hills Mountain Lion Foundation. Laundre labeled the agency’s lion statistics “not biologically honest” and warned that overhunting could have a devastating impact on the lion population and lead to a loss of its ecological functionality. GF & P plans to increase the total harvest from 40 to 45 and the female sub-quota from 25 to 30 as part of its proposed 2010-2015 mountain lion management plan. An additional season with a quota of five lions has been proposed for Custer state park. Laundre pointed out that GF & P’s estimate of approximately 250 cougars in the state is misleading because only about 160 would be adult animals and most of the immature cats will disperse to other areas. Because it is uncertain how many females are in the population and how many kittens survive each year the total number of lions may be considerably lower than GF & P estimates, Laundre said.

Dr. John Laundre holding two mountain lion kittens

The wildlife biologist, who also serves as vice-president of the Eastern Cougar Foundation, has conducted research on wolves and elk in Yellowstone National Park, cougar predation on mule deer in Idaho and pumas in the Chihuahuan desert. Laundre complimented GF & P for its “holistic guiding philosophy” regarding the return of mountain lions to the Black Hills and its progressive views on their role in ecosystems but urged the agency to rework its figures using a wider range of data.

Laundre explained how mountain lions and other top predators help restore the ecological integrity of forests. He said that the removal of large carnivores from the country’s eastern and southern forests have resulted in the disappearance of many varieties of both flora and fauna due to unchecked browsing by white-tailed deer. “Deer are instigating… the most massive change in forest habitat since uncontrolled logging in our early history,” the scientist said. “In some areas, the deer have cleared the woods of most of the plant varieties that once grew there. Lack of sufficient ground cover in turn leads to a decline in song birds that depend on the vegetation for nest building. Mountain lions and other large predators promote forest integrity not because they kill deer,” Laundre said, “but because of the effect they have on deer they don’t kill.” Cougars hunt by ambush and prefer areas where there is sufficient cover. Deer learn where lions are likely to prowl and tend to avoid those areas, which ensures the survival of plant species that the ungulates otherwise would eradicate.

Photo courtesy of the Mountain Lion Foundation

Laundre does not believe that it is necessary to cut lion numbers to preserve deer for human hunters. “Cougars just are not efficient enough as hunters to impact deer populations.” He estimated that predators and human hunters together typically remove about 12 per cent of the deer population every year, a tolerable reduction from which the cervines quickly recover. An avid deer hunter, Laundre said that sportsmen commonly blame predators, including cougars, when deer numbers are down, but heavy snowfalls are more likely to cause severe declines. He added that “hunting is not supposed to be like shopping at the supermarket.” It is a sport which involves elements of chance and skill.

Finally, the wildlife researcher said that although lions are powerful carnivores they rarely attack human beings. “It is more dangerous to walk the streets in any U. S. city at night than it is to hike or live in an area with mountain lions,” he said. Laundre presented slides depicting his work, including one in which he held three squirming cougar kittens. He related that during his years of research work he never was threatened by a wild cougar even when he snatched up and examined its babies.

The Black Hills Mountain Lion Foundation was created in 2003 after South Dakota removed the cougar from the state’s threatened species list and identified it as a big game animal. Our goals are to inform the public about mountain lion behavior and their importance to our ecosystem, help reduce human-lion conflicts, and fight for the preservation of these animals on their natural landscape. We support mountain lion management that is based on peer-reviewed science and encourage efforts to prevent habitat loss and fragmentation. For more information, email us at bhsdlions@yahoo.com or visit our website at www.blackhillslions.com.

APNM & WEG Protecting New Mexico’s Cougars

In response to the New Mexico Department of Game & Fish “waging war on the State’s cougars,” CTAL partners WildEarth Guardians and Animal Protection of New Mexico have teamed up on a campaign to Protect New Mexico Cougars!


About the Group

Protect New Mexico’s Cougars is a coalition of conservation and animal organizations, outdoor recreationists, biologists, hunters, and concerned citizens, who are opposed to radical, unsustainable increases in state-sponsored cougar hunting in New Mexico.

Our coalition has been on the frontline demanding that cougars’ management be based on the best available science – but not on fear.  Most New Mexicans appreciate and value these rare wild cats.

We work to achieve both sustainable cougar populations and peaceful coexistence–through Cougar Smart education. Killing to reduce fears about future negative encounters is outdated and has no place in modern wildlife management.

Just a few highlights of the site include:

  • information about the importance of protecting females and kittens
  • safety tips and how to be Cougar Smart
  • a PDF slideshow presentation
  • submission form to send comments directly to the New Mexico Game & Fish Commission

For more information visit ProtectNMCougars.org

OreCAT’s Letter to the Editor

Here is a reposting of a letter to the editor submitted by OreCAT Director Jayne Miller to the OregonLive.com news site.  It was printed on September 6, 2010.

Living with cougars

Are the six cougars showing up on one Willamette Valley farm unreal? (“Cougars on the prowl in Oregon,” Aug. 31) It certainly seems so.


Photo courtesy of the Mountain Lion Foundation

When raised in the wild by their mother, cougars do not lounge around in the grass near humans, nor do they congregate in packs, nor do they leave their prey unburied. I know this because we had cougars on our family’s 7,000-acre Oregon cattle ranch, and I grew up around them.

Cougars can be and are domesticated in captivity by humans and display the same nature these six cougars displayed. Could these cougars have been domesticated? We will never know, because they were all shot.

Considering that cougar incidents have seemed to occur like clockwork as the Legislature has opened in recent years, maybe it’s time for some objective inquiry to look more deeply into these situations. There are other, broader questions, too. How many cougars are necessary for a balanced ecosystem? How many deer should we manufacture for the purpose of killing them?

Oregonians are innovative. Can’t we think of better management programs than just killing our wildlife to protect around livestock?

Before we make any decision about our cougars, let’s thoroughly answer these questions first.

JAYNE MILLER
Jefferson